Local and State leaders talk about the Public Safety Realignment
“We should be able to control our population with (alternatives to
incarceration), if we can create (rehabilitative) programs. Luckily, in Tulare
County…we were able to use AB 109 to staff positions.”
Captain Robin Skiles, Tulare County Sheriff’s Department
(Source: The Recorder, Christine Burkhart, July 6, 2012)
“Taxpayers will save money by having (offenders) serve time in
county jail rather than in state prison. We're getting smarter on crime so we
can better invest limited resources on education rather than corrections, which
every poll shows Californians support. And of course education is our best
known crime prevention tool."
California State Senator Mark Leno
(Source: Associated Press,
Don Thompson, July 2, 2012)
"I am pleased with the progress Placer County is making in implementing
realignment."
Jack Duran, Placer County Supervisor
(
Source: Rocklin and Roseville Today, June 27, 2012)
“"(Fresno is) slowly moving in the right direction. We're not going to
solve our problems by tossing people in jail, like we've done, and then just
throw them back on the street." ,"
Debbie Reyes, Director of the Fresno-based California Prison Moratorium Project
(
Source: Fresno Bee, Kurtis Alexander, June 26, 2012)
"When it costs from $45,000 to incarcerate a person (in state prison),
and when that money could be used to rehabilitate four persons and get them
back on their feet, I think it's well worth the investment (in
rehabilitation)."
Merced County Sheriff Mark Pazine
(
Source: Merced Sun Star, Joshua Emerson Smith, June 26, 2012)
“In the big picture, in San Diego County, we believe we are adjusting
well…as long as we used the evidence-based principle of assessing risk to
identify who is best suited for (alternative custody) options, then we are
achieving our goal of managing public safety."
San Diego County Chief Probation Officer, Mack Jenkins
(Source: North County Times, Chris Nichols, June 21, 2012)
“Realignment is achieving its goals more quickly than even its supporters
had anticipated.”
(
Source: Center for Juvenile and Criminal Justice report http://1.usa.gov/K65U8k,
June 14, 2012)
"Putting as many people in prison for as long as possible is not the
best way to spend public dollars and protect public safety."
(
Source: Pew Center on the States report http://www.pewstates.org/research/report,
June 6, 2012)
“Realignment is achieving its goals more quickly than even its supporters
had anticipated.”
(
Source: Center for Juvenile and Criminal Justice report http://1.usa.gov/K65U8k,
June 14, 2012)
“Violent and career criminals belong behind bars, and for a long time, but
building more prisons to house lower-risk non-violent inmates for longer
sentences simply is not the best way to reduce crime.”
Adam Gelb, Director of the Public Safety Performance Project
(Source: Pew Center report “Time Served: The High Cost, Low Return
of Longer Prison Terms,” June 5, 2012)
“Governor Brown demonstrated once again his commitment to counties by
staying true to his vow to sustain funding for realignment.” (Regarding
Governor Edmund G. Brown Jr.’s May budget revise).
California State Association of Counties President and Yolo County
Supervisor, Mike McGowan
(
Source: CSAC press release May 14, 2012)
“With adequate time, attention and resources, a better plan will take shape
to track and manage inmates and work with community groups to re-integrate
offenders into the community.”
Santa Barbara County Chief Probation Officer, Beverly Taylor
(
Source: Santa Ynez Valley Journal, Jeremy Foster, May 11, 2012)
“California’s counties use state prison resources at dramatically different
rates, and … the counties which use state prisons the most have below-average
crime rates. Viewed this way, the state is simply … forcing counties to
pay for their sentencing decisions.”
(
Source: W. David Ball, Assistant Professor, Santa Clara Law School, in
his 2011 study “Tough on Crime (On the State’s Dime)”)
“I think all of us have been surprised how successful these people have been
and how they’ve changed.” (Regarding Tuolumne County’s new Day Reporting Center
for probationers, funded by the 2011 Public Safety Realignment).
Dan Hawks, manager of Tuolumne County Probation’s Adult Supervision Unit
(
Source: The Union Democrat, May 3, 2012)
“Reducing prison costs requires reducing the prison population in a way that
ensures the worst of the worst are appropriately punished while lower-level
offenders get the help needed to leave the system for good. (CDCR’s blueprint
and other prison proposals) offer a good starting point to achieve those
reforms.”
(
Source: Bakersfield Californian editorial, May 1, 2012)
“Since (Realignment) took effect last October, that shift has gone as
expected. Counties have not been overwhelmed. In fact, the number of offenders
released from county jails due to lack of space actually declined in the first
three months…But, make no mistake, California finally seems on the right path
to get its state prison population and management under control.”
(
Source: Sacramento Bee Editorial, Pia Lopez, April 29, 2012)
“The philosophy behind realignment is based on more than a decade of
thinking, studying, evidence-gathering and soul-searching over the costly cycle
of crime, incarceration, failure and return to prison…The public can be safer,
the cycle can be broken, and tax money can be spent more constructively — and
more frugally.”
(Source: Los Angeles Times editorial, April 25, 2012)
“While criminal justice realignment presents the most significant challenge
ever faced by the Inyo County Justice System and local treatment providers, the
ultimate goal of public safety can be achieved with effective communication,
collaboration and fiscally responsible decision-making with respect to our
limited resources.”
Inyo County Chief Probation Officer Jeff Thomson
(Source: Inyo Register, Mike Gervais, April 17, 2012)
“In addition to the enforcement (and) compliance component, probation has
focused on a number of resources that are traditionally outside of the role
parole provides. We focus on treatment elements which range from employment
resources to substance abuse programming. We are modeling these probation
programs for Post-Release Community Supervision (PRCS), I do believe that our
success rate for probationers will transfer to the PRCS cases.”
Chris Condon, San Bernardino County Probation Department
(Source: High Desert Daily Press, Beatriz E. Valenzuela, March 12,
2012)
"Nobody is being released early, they're doing their time.” (Speaking
about implementing effective drug-rehabilitation and anger management programs)
It’s not about incarceration.”
Tulare County Sheriff Bill Wittman
(Source: Visalia Times Delta, Luis Hernandez, March 12, 2012)
For more What They're Saying information please see previous press releases:
http://cdcrtoday.blogspot.com/2012/03/what-theyre-saying-about-realignment.html
http://cdcrtoday.blogspot.com/2012/01/what-theyre-saying-about-realignment.html
###
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
July 11, 2012
Contact: Dana Simas
(916) 445-4950